Thursday, April 21, 2011

the blurred reality of humanity

The Independent | If you can be sure of one thing, then surely it is that you exist. Even if the world were a dream or a hallucination, it would still need you to be dreaming or hallucinating it. And if you know nothing else about yourself, surely you know that you have a mind, one perspective on the world, one unified consciousness?

Yet throughout history, there has been no shortage of people claiming that the self doesn't exist after all, and that the individual ego is an illusion. And such claims are no longer the preserve of meditators and mystics. The only disagreement many scientists would have with philosopher Thomas Metzinger's claim that "modern philosophy of mind and cognitive neuroscience together are about to shatter the myth of the self" is that the destruction has already occurred.

There is a wide range of scientific evidence that is used to deny "I think, therefore I am". In René Descartes' famous deduction, a coherent, structured experience of the world is inextricably linked with a sense of a self at the heart of it. But as the clinical neuropsychologist Paul Broks explained to me, we now know the two can in fact be separated.

People with Cotard's syndrome, for instance, can think that they don't exist, an impossibility for Descartes. Broks describes it as a kind of "nihilistic delusion" in which they "have no sense of being alive in the moment, but they'll give you their life history". They think, but they do not have sense that therefore they are.

Then there is temporal lobe epilepsy, which can give sufferers an experience called transient epileptic amnesia. "The world around them stays just as real and vivid – in fact, even more vivid sometimes – but they have no sense of who they are," Broks explains. This reminds me of Georg Lichtenberg's correction of Descartes, who he claims was entitled to deduce from "I think" only the conclusion that "there is thought". This is precisely how it can seem to people with temporal lobe epilepsy: there is thought, but they have no idea whose thought it is.

You don't need to have a serious neural pathology to experience the separation of sense of self and conscious experience. Millions of people have claimed to get this feeling from meditation, and many thousands more from ingesting certain drugs.

While some people experience lack of self, some seem to have more than one. Most obviously there are sufferers of dissociative identity disorder, the preferred term these days for multiple personality disorder. Perhaps even more interesting are the "split-brain" patients of Roger Sperry and Michael Gazzaniga. As a last resort in an experimental procedure to treat severe epilepsy, Sperry and Gazzaniga severed the connection (the corpus callosum) between the two hemispheres of the brain. The results of this operation, called a commissurotomy, was that the epilepsy was indeed much reduced. But then Sperry and Gazzaniga conducted some experiments that revealed a remarkable, unforeseen side effect.

Patients were asked to focus on a dot in the centre of a screen. Words and images were then flashed up for a few seconds on either the right or left side of the screen. When these appeared on the right side of the screen, the patients were easily able to say what they were. But when they appeared on the left of the screen, they claimed to have seen nothing. However, if asked to draw an object with their left hand, they would draw what they had just seen, all the time denying they had seen any such thing. They could also manipulate or use the object normally with their left hands. So what was going on?

The way in which vision works is that information from the right visual field is processed by the left brain hemisphere, while information from the left visual field is processed by the right hemisphere. But it is the left hemisphere that (in most people) controls speech. Because normally the corpus callosum allows the two hemispheres to communicate, this presents no practical difficulty for most people. But after a commissurotomy, this information exchange cannot occur. That means that if you control carefully which side of the brain receives information from the environment, you can effectively make one hemisphere aware of something that the other is not. What is astonishing about this is that for this to be possible, there would have to be two centres of awareness in the individual concerned. Commissurotomy therefore seems to show that selves can be divided – at least temporarily – or that they needn't have just one centre of consciousness after all.

Intriguingly, however, in normal life, such patients experience the world in the normal, unified way. Gazzaniga's explanation of this is that "we don't miss what we no longer have access to". Consciousness of self emerges from a network of thousands or millions of conscious moments. This means that when we lose bits, the way a split-brain patient does, we don't sense anything as lost at all. Gazzaniga explains this thought with a metaphor of a pipe organ. "The thousands or millions of conscious moments that we each have reflect one of our networks being 'up for duty'. These networks are all over the place, not in one specific location. When one finishes, the next one pops up. The pipe organ-like device plays its tune all day long. What makes emergent human consciousness so vibrant is that our pipe organ has lots of tunes to play."

1 comments:

CNu said...

Into what is the universe expanding? http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2011/apr/13/into-what-is-universe-expanding

Infinities behave in strange ways. One analogy often used is to consider the surface of a balloon. This is infinite in the sense that it has no edge, but as the balloon is inflated, every point on its surface moves away from every other. However, although the balloon's surface is two-dimensional, the three-dimensional balloon itself is expanding. If we extend this analogy to the three- dimensional universe, we must conclude that space is curved, and that the universe is expanding into a fourth dimension.

Perhaps a better way to understand the situation is to consider the properties of infinite mathematical series. There is an infinite number of counting numbers (1, 2, 3, 4, etc). Only half of them are even. But there is also an infinite number of even numbers – every counting number can be multiplied by 2. In the same way, in an infinite universe, when everything is twice as far apart as it is now, there will be still be enough room for everything.

Tim Lidbetter, Kingston, Surrey

The universe, I believe, by the act of expansion creates time and space into which, if you wish, you could say it fits, but it is not filling a void as such.

Nic Greene, Richmond, Surrey

Our universe is all of space-time, and space-time is all of our universe. Our language, with the possible exception of mathematics, is rooted in space-time, and we have no language for "that-which-is-not-space-time". There is no "what" that the universe is expanding into because "what", "where" and "when" are properties of space-time, not that-which-is-not-space-time.

So where does that leave us? Unfortunately, it leaves us with Wittgenstein: "What can be said at all can be said clearly, and what we cannot talk about we must pass over in silence." Sorry.

Jim Ford, Watford, Herts

It's confined by the mesh that the flying spaghetti monster is knitting with his noodly stick. Either that or it has something to do with the hypersphere as described by Poincaré, making the universe finite but unbounded.

Dave Foddy, Northwich, Cheshire

Master Arbitrageur Nancy Pelosi Is At It Again....,

🇺🇸TUCKER: HOW DID NANCY PELOSI GET SO RICH? Tucker: "I have no clue at all how Nancy Pelosi is just so rich or how her stock picks ar...